Waiver Wire, August 7

109 rosterable players owned in under half of leagues; 44 barely owned at all.

109 players clear the value of the last man rostered in a twelve-team league while being owned in under half of leagues. This is the first version of this article the site could write with real ownership numbers behind it rather than a proxy, "available" here is measured, not inferred.

Best available

Ranked by what the engine says they are worth, not by how many people have already noticed. The trend column is ownership movement: a player climbing fast has been noticed, and a valuable player sitting flat has not.

Barely owned anywhere

Under 15% ownership and still above roster-relevant value. In deeper formats these are the names worth a speculative add; in shallow ones they are the reason the waiver wire is not empty in August.

Already being added

Ownership climbing fastest among the available. If you want one of these, the window is measured in hours rather than days, and it is worth checking whether the move is news-driven before paying up for it.

What this means

Start with Mickey Moniak, because he is the one case in this table where the two numbers that matter both point the same way and the ownership does not. A forward rank of 84 is the best mark on the board among the bats, better than Paredes at 101 and better than Durbin at 124, and yet Moniak sits at 33.7 percent owned with a trend of +0.09. That trend is the tell. Nobody is moving. The market is anchored on the name and the profile it remembers, and the projection is anchored on the playing time and production it currently sees. When those two disagree and the ownership line is flat, you get the add for free instead of paying a waiver claim into a bidding war. He is my single best add here.

The case against is real and I would not wave it off. Rank 84 with a value of 257 means the engine likes the rate of production more than the volume it expects to accumulate, and Moniak's whole career shape is one where the volume disappears the moment the batting average dips. Compare Paredes, who carries a higher value at 308 on a slightly worse rank, which is the signature of a player the model expects to keep the lineup card. Moniak does not have that. The falsifier is simple and it is visible within two weeks: if he is still getting the full side of the platoon and hitting in the top six, the 84 is honest. If the starts thin out against lefties, the rank will fall faster than anything else in this group, and you cut him having lost nothing but a bench spot.

Now the climber I would not touch. Keider Montero has moved +4.17 in ownership, the largest jump on the board, and he is the weakest asset attached to a good rank anywhere here. Value 149 is the lowest number in the table. Rank 133 is respectable, but pair a low value with a strong rank and what you are looking at is a pitcher whose projected contribution is thin even if the projection is exactly right. There is no upside inside that combination. Twenty-one point eight percent owned and climbing four points a week means someone streamed him into a good line and the wire followed. That is a chase, not an edge.

If you want the pitching version of the Moniak argument, it is not Montero and it is certainly not Shane Drohan, who is up 3.70 on a rank of 422. Rank 422 is the engine telling you it does not expect this to hold. Cade Cavalli at least has rank 190 behind his +2.55, but he is already 38.7 percent owned, which means the discount is gone. The mechanism across all three is identical: recent results moved the ownership, and in two of the three cases the forward projection never moved with it. Buy the one where both moved. That is Cavalli, and even then only at the price of a low-end bench arm.

Two more worth a claim if Moniak is gone. Alec Bohm is 18.0 percent owned on rank 154 with a trend of essentially zero, which is the flat-market signature again. Royce Lewis is a different bet entirely: rank 275 is not good, but the +2.18 trend and triple eligibility at 15.8 percent owned mean you are buying the roster flexibility and the health lottery ticket, not the projection.

Add Moniak, hold your last bench spot rather than spending it on Montero, and reassess in ten days.

How to read this

Ownership is the share of ESPN leagues rostering the player. That is a strong proxy for availability and it is not your league: a player at forty per cent is freely available in one format and long gone in another, and this article has not seen your waiver wire.

The trend column matters more than the level. A valuable player at low ownership who is not moving has genuinely gone unnoticed; the same player climbing two points a day was noticed this morning, and by the time you read this the answer may already be different.

Value is the replacement-adjusted number the boards sort on, and roughly 134 is the 300th-ranked player, the last man rostered in a standard league. Everyone here clears that bar, which is what makes them worth the add rather than merely available.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings