Waiver Wire, August 6

111 rosterable players owned in under half of leagues; 47 barely owned at all.

111 players clear the value of the last man rostered in a twelve-team league while being owned in under half of leagues. This is the first version of this article the site could write with real ownership numbers behind it rather than a proxy, "available" here is measured, not inferred.

Best available

Ranked by what the engine says they are worth, not by how many people have already noticed. The trend column is ownership movement: a player climbing fast has been noticed, and a valuable player sitting flat has not.

Barely owned anywhere

Under 15% ownership and still above roster-relevant value. In deeper formats these are the names worth a speculative add; in shallow ones they are the reason the waiver wire is not empty in August.

Already being added

Ownership climbing fastest among the available. If you want one of these, the window is measured in hours rather than days, and it is worth checking whether the move is news-driven before paying up for it.

What this means

Mickey Moniak is the name to take. A forward rank of 76 is the best mark on this entire list, better than Paredes at 95 and Stott at 123, and he is owned in barely a third of ESPN leagues. His ownership is creeping, up 1.52, but that is a trickle against a rank that says he belongs in the top hundred players rostered anywhere. The gap is the whole argument. The market is pricing Moniak off a reputation as a strong-side platoon body who has never held a full-time job, and the projection is pricing him off what it expects him to do the rest of the way. Those two things can both be reasonable and still leave 67 percent of leagues with him on the wire.

The mechanism matters because it tells you what breaks the read. Moniak's value figure of 257 sits below Stott's 325 and Paredes' 314, which is the tell: the accumulated number is modest while the forward number is elite. That combination almost always means playing time, not skill, is what changed. He is being credited with a bigger role than he has had. So the falsifier is simple and it is visible in a lineup card. If he is starting against left-handed pitching two weeks from now, the rank is right and you got a top-hundred bat for nothing. If he is sitting every time a lefty starts and hitting eighth against righties, the 76 collapses and you drop him having lost one bench slot.

The strongest case against is Isaac Paredes, and it is a real case. Rank 95 with the highest accumulated value on the board outside Stott, and his ownership is going the wrong way at minus 0.13. Somebody is dropping a top-hundred projected bat. I would rather have Paredes if my roster needs floor, because his 314 says he has already banked production while Moniak's 257 says his case is mostly ahead of him. But 45.3 percent ownership means he is contested in half your leagues and Moniak is not, and the cheaper path to the same rank is the one I take.

The name climbing fastest is the one to leave alone. Noah Cameron has added 5.39 percentage points of ownership, the biggest move here by a wide margin, and he is the worst player on the page: value 141, rank 364. Nothing in the forward number supports the buying. That is a two-start week or a shutout being chased, and the projection has looked at it and shrugged. Casey Mize is a different story at the same speed. He is up 3.79 to 45 percent, but his rank of 147 and value of 282 both hold up, so that flow is people arriving late at something real. Cameron's is not.

Trevor Rogers and Bryce Elder are the same trap in a softer form. Both are up more than three points, both carry value of 188, and both rank outside 260. Warren, up 2.72 with a rank of 305, belongs in the same bin. If you need a streamer this week and the matchup is right, fine. Do not use a permanent spot on any of them.

One caution on Moniak. These are projections, and a rank of 76 built on an assumed everyday role is the most fragile kind of good number. The cost of being wrong is a week of a bench slot. The cost of passing is watching a top-hundred bat get claimed by somebody who read the same column you did.

How to read this

Ownership is the share of ESPN leagues rostering the player. That is a strong proxy for availability and it is not your league: a player at forty per cent is freely available in one format and long gone in another, and this article has not seen your waiver wire.

The trend column matters more than the level. A valuable player at low ownership who is not moving has genuinely gone unnoticed; the same player climbing two points a day was noticed this morning, and by the time you read this the answer may already be different.

Value is the replacement-adjusted number the boards sort on, and roughly 134 is the 300th-ranked player, the last man rostered in a standard league. Everyone here clears that bar, which is what makes them worth the add rather than merely available.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings