Waiver Wire, August 5

111 rosterable players owned in under half of leagues; 47 barely owned at all.

111 players clear the value of the last man rostered in a twelve-team league while being owned in under half of leagues. This is the first version of this article the site could write with real ownership numbers behind it rather than a proxy, "available" here is measured, not inferred.

Best available

Ranked by what the engine says they are worth, not by how many people have already noticed. The trend column is ownership movement: a player climbing fast has been noticed, and a valuable player sitting flat has not.

Barely owned anywhere

Under 15% ownership and still above roster-relevant value. In deeper formats these are the names worth a speculative add; in shallow ones they are the reason the waiver wire is not empty in August.

Already being added

Ownership climbing fastest among the available. If you want one of these, the window is measured in hours rather than days, and it is worth checking whether the move is news-driven before paying up for it.

What this means

Mickey Moniak is the name to act on. A forward rank of 76 is the best mark on this entire list, better than Paredes at 95 and Stott at 123, and he sits at 32.9 percent ownership with the trailing trend moving 1.52 points his way. That combination is the whole argument. The market is adding him, but slowly, and it is adding him at a pace that suggests people are treating him as a streaming outfielder rather than a top-100 asset. His raw value of 257 is lower than Stott's 325 or Paredes's 314, which tells you the engine is not projecting a monster line. It is projecting a useful everyday one and pricing the playing time as real.

That is the mechanism worth naming: rank and value disagree here because value is scale and rank is the forward read. Stott carries more accumulated value but ranks 47 spots worse. Jurickson Profar makes the same point in reverse and more violently: 267 of value against a forward rank of 844. Whatever the engine sees ahead of him, it is not the bat that produced that value figure, and at 4.7 percent owned with a trend of essentially zero, nobody is arguing with it. Leave him alone.

The case against Moniak is straightforward and a smart reader should make it. He is listed at OF/DH, which is the profile that loses at-bats first when a team gets healthy, and a rank of 76 built on a value of 257 means the projection is leaning on continued regular starts rather than on rate production. Paredes is the safer version of the same idea: 45.3 percent owned, dual eligibility at third and first, and a trend of negative 0.13 that says the crowd is drifting away from him for no reason visible in this data. If you need corner infield rather than outfield, take Paredes and accept the 20-spot rank downgrade. The falsifier for Moniak is lineup position and frequency. If he is not starting five or six times a week two weeks from now, the rank of 76 is a projection of a role he no longer has, and you drop him without regret. The cost of being wrong is one bench spot.

Noah Cameron is the climber I would not pay for. His trailing trend of 5.39 is the largest number on this page by a wide margin, and it has taken him to 19.2 percent ownership. Look at what is underneath it: a value of 141, the lowest here, and a forward rank of 364. The engine is telling you he pitched well recently and it still does not want him. That gap is the entire tell. Ownership is chasing a result; the forward number has not moved to meet it. Will Warren is the same shape with less enthusiasm, 157 of value at rank 305 while 43.6 percent of leagues already hold him, which means you would be buying at the top of the market.

Casey Mize is the pitcher I would actually take. A rank of 147 with a value of 282 is a genuinely different animal from Cameron, and the trend of 3.79 says the adds are arriving alongside a projection that supports them rather than in spite of it. Trevor Rogers is close on trend at 3.77 but ranks 284 and is already 49.9 percent owned, so the discount is gone.

So: Moniak first, Mize second if you need innings, Paredes if the infield is the hole. Skip Cameron. The test on him is simple. If his forward rank has not climbed out of the 300s after another two starts, the ownership spike was noise, and you will have saved yourself the spot.

How to read this

Ownership is the share of ESPN leagues rostering the player. That is a strong proxy for availability and it is not your league: a player at forty per cent is freely available in one format and long gone in another, and this article has not seen your waiver wire.

The trend column matters more than the level. A valuable player at low ownership who is not moving has genuinely gone unnoticed; the same player climbing two points a day was noticed this morning, and by the time you read this the answer may already be different.

Value is the replacement-adjusted number the boards sort on, and roughly 134 is the 300th-ranked player, the last man rostered in a standard league. Everyone here clears that bar, which is what makes them worth the add rather than merely available.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings