Board Movers, August 5

11 players moved more than 100 projected points in the last day.

The board re-ran and 11 players moved by more than 100 projected points in the last day. That is roughly the top 1% of daily movement, on a normal day the median player shifts under 3 points, so these are the re-forecasts worth knowing about, not noise.

Moving up

PlayerPosChangeProj pts nowValueWhy
Riley GreeneOF/DH+111462+58Re-forecast

Moving down

PlayerPosChangeProj pts nowValueWhy
James WoodOF/DH-224294-231Health
Ryan HelsleyRP-14789-31Health
Corbin BurnesSP-13586-62Health
Byron BuxtonOF/DH-135236-209Health
Cole RagansSP-124189-43Health
Nick Kurtz1B-119285-179Health
Brandon WoodruffSP-111262-110Health
Spencer StriderSP-107103-45Health
Robert GarciaRP-10390-16Health
Ben Rice1B/DH/C-102385-41Re-forecast

The ones that are not just injuries

2 of these 11 moved with no injury designation attached. That is the engine re-forecasting a healthy player, a role change, a call-up sticking, playing time being reallocated, and it is the more actionable half of this list, because nobody else is watching for it: Riley Greene (+111), Ben Rice (-102).

What this means

Riley Greene is the only name on this list that moved up without an injury flag doing the work, and that makes him the one case here that should actually change a roster. A jump of 111 projected points to 462 is not a rounding adjustment. It is the model rewriting what it thinks his rest-of-season rate looks like, on a healthy player, with no games-played mechanism to hide behind. The value move of plus 58 is smaller than the points move, which is what you would expect: outfield is deep enough that raw counting stats do not convert one for one into scarcity. Still, the direction is unambiguous and it is the only unambiguous upward signal in the window.

The case against buying it is the length of the window. A re-forecast on a healthy hitter over a stretch this short is usually built on a hot run of contact, and the model cannot tell you whether the barrels are real or the schedule was soft. If you want the falsifier, it is simple: watch whether the underlying rate holds when the next re-forecast lands. If Greene gives back forty or fifty of those points on the next pass with no injury attached, the engine was chasing a stretch of at-bats and you paid for noise. If the 462 holds or nudges higher, he is being priced as a top-of-the-board outfielder and the plus 58 was too conservative. I would trade for him now and accept the risk. The cost of being wrong is that you gave up a mid-tier arm for a good outfielder instead of a great one.

Ben Rice is the interesting negative, because he is the other re-forecast and the numbers pull in opposite directions. Down 102 projected points to 385, but only minus 41 in value. That gap is the whole story. Rice carries first base, DH and catcher eligibility, and catcher is where value comes from having nobody behind you. So the model can shave a hundred points off his line and the market barely flinches, because the alternative at the position is worse than the alternative in the outfield. Do not sell into this. A 385-point projection with catcher eligibility is still a starting asset in almost any format, and the value column is telling you the league already knows it.

The health moves are a different animal and mostly do not require action. James Wood at minus 224 points and minus 231 in value is the largest single drop on the board, and the two numbers moving together is the signal: the games are simply gone, and there is no positional cushion to absorb them. That is not the model changing its mind about Wood the hitter. It is arithmetic on a shortened denominator, already reflected in whatever you would get for him.

The pitchers are where the mechanical drops read cheapest. Corbin Burnes loses 135 projected points down to 86, but only 62 in value, and Spencer Strider loses 107 to 103 with a value hit of 45. Both ratios say the same thing: replacement-level starting pitching is close enough that missing time costs you far less than the point total suggests. If you have the IL spot, these are the roster decisions that make themselves. Hold, stash, and let the projection catch back up if the designation lifts. The one genuine cost is opportunity: an IL slot occupied by an arm projected for 86 points is a slot not holding a healthy bat, and if the designation drags into September that stash was dead weight.

What moved these numbers

These are projection changes, not results. A jump usually means the engine now expects more playing time, a return from the IL, a rotation or bullpen role changing, a call-up sticking, and a drop usually means the opposite. The Note column flags anyone currently carrying an injury designation, which explains a large share of both directions.

Proj pts is the full-season projection as it stands today and Value is the replacement-adjusted number the boards sort on. Generated from the daily board archive, which is why the window is exact rather than "recently".

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings

Skip to main content

Redraft Rest of Season

Sorted by -
Loading history…
Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Loading…
Loading rankings…
Overview

Operations Dashboard

Portfolio and league analytics.
Workspace ready
Use Sync to import a roster.

2026 FYPD Class

Players entering the MiLB system for the first time: the 2026 MLB Draft class and first-time international signees. Ranked by dynasty value: a measured expectation from draft slot or debut production, adjusted by the age curve. For established prospects, see the Prospect board.

Prospect Player Rankings

Top-100 + all 30 org Top-30 lists · ranked by projected Prospect Value · AAA Statcast tools →
Loading prospect rankings…
Loading study…

Methodology

Every signal, formula, and data source the model uses for player evaluation - organized by product.

Loading methodology…

Risers & Fallers - last 30 days