Waiver Wire, August 10

109 rosterable players owned in under half of leagues; 45 barely owned at all.

109 players clear the value of the last man rostered in a twelve-team league while being owned in under half of leagues. This is the first version of this article the site could write with real ownership numbers behind it rather than a proxy, "available" here is measured, not inferred.

Best available

Ranked by what the engine says they are worth, not by how many people have already noticed. The trend column is ownership movement: a player climbing fast has been noticed, and a valuable player sitting flat has not.

Barely owned anywhere

Under 15% ownership and still above roster-relevant value. In deeper formats these are the names worth a speculative add; in shallow ones they are the reason the waiver wire is not empty in August.

Already being added

Ownership climbing fastest among the available. If you want one of these, the window is measured in hours rather than days, and it is worth checking whether the move is news-driven before paying up for it.

What this means

Start with the contradiction the table hands you: Jurickson Profar carries a value of 267, higher than Jo Adell, Alec Bohm or JJ Bleday, and he is owned in 4.7 percent of ESPN leagues. His forward rank is 855. Those two numbers cannot both be describing the same player's next month, and the gap between them is the most interesting thing on this page. Value here is scoring the production; the rank is scoring the expectation. When a hitter's value sits in the top tier of what is available and his rank sits at 855, the engine is telling you it does not expect the production to continue. The market has already agreed, which is why nobody owns him and why the trend is a flat -0.01. Nobody is arguing about Profar. That is usually a sign the price is right, not a sign it is wrong.

So the best add is not the most extreme number. It is Bryson Stott. He is the only hitter on this list where the value and the rank point the same direction: 362, easily the highest here, against a forward rank of 114. He is also the only bat with a real bid behind him, up 1.94 in ownership, and at 44.6 percent he is still available in more than half of leagues. Multi-week middle infield help at that price is the cleanest transaction on the board.

The case against Stott is a fair one and worth making properly. A 44.6 percent ownership and a rising trend means you are not getting ahead of anything: the rooms that wanted him have mostly taken him, and the ones that have not may have a reason, usually power. Isaac Paredes at rank 105 and Mickey Moniak at 101 both project better on a per-slot basis than Stott's 114, and Moniak is available in two thirds of leagues. If your roster needs home runs rather than a stable second baseman, the 362 is a batting average and runs number you are already covered on, and the correct move is Paredes. The falsifier is straightforward: if Stott's ownership stalls in the mid-forties over the next two weeks while the value holds, the market is telling you the shape of his production does not fit most rosters, and I would take that seriously.

The name climbing fast that I would not spend on is Bryce Elder. He leads this list in trend by a mile at +5.90, and 49.2 percent ownership makes him the most-owned player on a page of unowned players. His value is 200. That is the lowest hitter-or-pitcher value here outside of Noah Cameron, and his rank of 245 is worse than Michael Busch, Jonathan Aranda and Jac Caglianone. What is producing the run is visible enough: streaming managers chasing a good line and a schedule, not an engine that has changed its mind. A rank of 245 after a 5.9 point ownership jump means the projection watched the same starts the market did and moved on.

Cameron is the same trade at a discount, up 3.55 to 25.4 percent on a value of 168 and rank 308, and he is the one I would drop first.

The decision: add Stott, and if he is gone, Paredes at 43.3 percent for the power. Let Elder go to someone else and take the ratio risk off your hands. The cost of being wrong on Elder is one good six-inning start you did not get. The cost of being right is three weeks of a 5.00 ERA you cannot cut fast enough.

How to read this

Ownership is the share of ESPN leagues rostering the player. That is a strong proxy for availability and it is not your league: a player at forty per cent is freely available in one format and long gone in another, and this article has not seen your waiver wire.

The trend column matters more than the level. A valuable player at low ownership who is not moving has genuinely gone unnoticed; the same player climbing two points a day was noticed this morning, and by the time you read this the answer may already be different.

Value is the replacement-adjusted number the boards sort on, and roughly 134 is the 300th-ranked player, the last man rostered in a standard league. Everyone here clears that bar, which is what makes them worth the add rather than merely available.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings