IL Tracker, August 8

7 rostered players on the IL, with measured timelines by injury type.

7 rostered players are on the injured list. This is not a return-date report, nothing on this site knows when anyone comes back, but it does pair how long each player has already been out against what that injury has actually cost the 277 players who have returned from one this season.

Out the longest

Days already missed, against the measured median for the same injury. The range in brackets is the middle half of those cases, for an elbow it spans three weeks to three months, which is why no single date belongs here.

What each injury has cost this season

Every returned case, by body part. Sample sizes are shown because they are the whole story: a median off nine cases is a hint, and one off forty-three is close to a planning number.

What this means

Soto is the case to argue about. Fourteen days gone against a calf strain that typically costs 45 days across 17 cases this season means the clock has barely started, and he is the most valuable player on this list at 260. The mechanism here is not the injury severity, it is the mismatch between the IL10 label and what calves actually do. A calf is a pushing-off injury for a hitter who has to load and rotate, and the measured median says the typical case this year ran three times as long as Soto has been out. If you are holding him expecting something imminent, you are holding on the designation, not the evidence.

The case against dropping him is straightforward and it is a good one: at a value of 260 there is nothing on your waiver wire that replaces him, and a full month of an empty roster spot still costs less than losing the best bat in the pool for the rest of the year. I agree with that, and it is why Soto is a hold in any format with an IL slot. In a league without one, it is a genuine decision, and the falsifier is simple. If he is not running the bases in a rehab context and the team keeps quietly extending things, you are looking at the long half of that 45-day distribution and the spot has to go to a playing body.

Wood is the one I would treat differently, and the number that drives it is four. Four days into a left oblique strain, with a measured median of 30 days across 34 cases, the largest sample on this list. Obliques do not get shortcut. A value of 365 says the projection still loves him, and that value is exactly why the temptation is to sit and wait, but four days in means essentially the entire absence is still ahead of you. Hold him only if the spot is free. If you are burning an active roster slot on a hitter who has not yet begun the typical wait, you are paying full price for the least informative part of the timeline.

Schmitt and Buxton are the two closest to the other end. Schmitt has missed eleven days against a median of 18 for a knee meniscus tear, and he carries five positions worth of eligibility at a value of 158. That combination is the cheapest hold on the board: near the back of the typical window, and when he returns he plugs any hole you have. Buxton at 182 sits ten days into an 18-day median for hip impingement, which reads the same on paper, with one difference I would weigh. Impingement is a recurring irritation more than a discrete tear, and the 11-case sample behind that 18 is the thinnest here. I would hold both, and I would trust Schmitt's number more.

That leaves the ones where the data simply does not speak. Kurtz and Ryan both come with no sample for their injury type, and there is no honest way to place them from what is here. Four days into a thumb strain and one day into a glute strain, the only thing the data supports is that neither has been out long enough to learn anything. Do not drop a 200-value first baseman or a 163-value starter on a shrug. Bellinger, thirteen days into a hamstring against a 26-day median with 33 cases behind it, is the unremarkable one: roughly halfway, well-sampled, hold and stop thinking about it. If you must cut someone today, cut the deepest hold with the longest road left, and accept that with Wood you are paying for that spot twice.

How to read this

Days out is counted from the transaction that placed the player on the list. Current status comes from the live injury feed, which is authoritative for who is out but carries no dates at all, the two are joined per player.

The typical column is a median with its sample size and interquartile range, and it describes other players, not this one. It is context for how long an injury of that kind has been costing people, not a forecast for anybody.

Only players above roster-relevant value appear. An injury to someone nobody rosters is not a fantasy event, and listing every one would bury the handful that change a lineup.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings