Schedule Strength, August 8

TEX has the best week for hitters; CLE the toughest.

Two things decide a week and neither is on a rankings page: how many games a team plays, and who they play. Between August 8 and August 14, 2026 the league splits 24 teams play 6 / 6 teams play 7, and opponents range from allowing 3.93 runs a game to 5.02, a spread worth more than most waiver moves.

Best weeks for your hitters

Most games against the pitching that gives up the most. This is the column to use for streaming bats and for deciding which of two similar players to start all week.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
TEX74.92LAA x4, BAL x2, ATH
BOS74.86TOR x4, ATH x2, PIT
LAD74.53KC x3, AZ x2, MIL x2
LAA74.47TEX x4, MIA x2, KC
MIL74.39SD x3, MIN x2, LAD x2
CHC65.02WSH x3, KC x2, STL
TB65.02ATH x3, SEA x2, BAL
CIN64.92CWS x3, WSH x2, MIA

Best weeks for your pitchers

The opposite question, and it needs the opposite column: most games against the offenses that score the least. A team can have a fine week for its bats and a poor one for its arms, which is why these are two tables and not one strength-of-schedule number.

TeamGamesOpp runs scored/gmOpponents
BOS74.17TOR x4, ATH x2, PIT
LAA74.18TEX x4, MIA x2, KC
TEX74.26LAA x4, BAL x2, ATH
LAD74.47KC x3, AZ x2, MIL x2
TOR74.48BOS x4, PHI x2, NYY
MIL74.59SD x3, MIN x2, LAD x2
DET64.06CLE x3, SF x2, CWS
HOU64.15SF x3, SD x2, SEA

Weeks to avoid

Fewest games, toughest opposition. If you have a marginal player here, this is the week to use the roster spot on someone else.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
CLE64.01DET x3, CWS x2, SD
ATH64.02TB x3, BOS x2, TEX
NYY64.05SEA x3, ATL x2, TOR
SEA64.08NYY x3, TB x2, HOU
KC64.15LAD x3, CHC x2, LAA

What this means

Texas and Boston are the whole story next week, and the reason is not opponent quality. Seven games against pitching staffs that give up 4.92 and 4.86 runs a game is roughly a sixth more volume than the six-game teams get, sitting on top of the second and third softest slates on the board. That combination is rare. Normally the seven-game weeks land against good teams, because a team playing an extra game is usually playing a division opponent it sees often. Here it does not. A Rangers or Red Sox bat you were platooning, or a fifth outfielder you keep for counting stats, starts every day this week without a second thought.

The comparison that should settle it is Chicago and Tampa Bay. Both draw the softest pitching on the slate at 5.02 runs allowed per game, and both play six. That is a better per-game environment than Texas gets. It is not a better week. One extra game is about seventeen percent more plate appearances, and the gap in opponent quality between 5.02 and 4.92 is a tenth of a run, which is noise across six or seven games. I would start the Rangers bat over the Cub every time here, and I would not consider it close. The mechanism is simple: game count is a near-certainty, opponent run environment is an average that a single starting pitcher can wreck.

The strongest case against that is playing time itself. A seven-game week almost always means a doubleheader or a compressed travel stretch, which is exactly when a manager rests a regular or a part-timer loses the second half of a twin bill. If your Boston hitter is a strong-side platoon guy rather than an everyday player, the seventh game may never reach him, and you have paid for volume you did not receive. Check the lineup card, not the schedule. If he sits the front end of the doubleheader, the edge is gone and the six-game bat with the better matchups was the right call.

On the pitching side the calculus flips, and it flips hard. Boston's opponents score 4.17 runs a game, the lowest mark on the board, and Los Angeles of Anaheim is right behind at 4.18 with the same seven games. That is the pairing worth acting on: a two-start arm in either rotation gets volume and quiet offenses at the same time, which almost never happens together. Texas at 4.26 is nearly as good. Meanwhile Cleveland, the Athletics and Seattle all offer decent pitching environments at 4.47, 4.41 and 4.52, but only across six games, and their hitters are stuck against staffs allowing 4.01, 4.02 and 4.08. Bench those bats. There is no volume to rescue them.

Milwaukee is the trap. Seven games reads like an automatic start until you notice the opponents allow only 4.39 runs and score 4.59, the second-highest figure here. That is a week where the extra game helps your hitters modestly and actively hurts your pitchers. I would ride the bats for the volume and sit anyone in that rotation I am not obligated to start, because 4.59 runs of opposing offense across two turns is a lot of exposure to a bad ratio night. Cincinnati at 4.99 is worse still, and only gets six games to do damage in.

The decision list is short. Start every Texas and Boston bat you own. Start the two-start Boston or Angels arm ahead of a nominally better pitcher facing a six-game Cincinnati or Arizona slate. Sit Cleveland and Athletics hitters. If a rainout hits Texas or Boston mid-week and the seventh game vanishes, the whole edge collapses to a rounding error, and that is the one thing that would prove this read wrong.

How to read this

Game count leads and opponent quality breaks the tie, in that order. The difference between five games and seven is nearly a third of a week's production from the same player, which is a bigger effect than any realistic difference in who is pitching.

Hitters and pitchers get separate tables because they are asking opposite questions. Your bats want opponents who allow runs; your arms want opponents who do not score them, and one number cannot say both.

Opponent quality is full-season runs per game, not a recent hot streak. Ten games of a pitching staff is noise, and the question here is which schedule to prefer rather than which team is playing well this week.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings

Skip to main content

Redraft Rest of Season

Sorted by -
Loading history…
Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Loading…
Loading rankings…
Overview

Operations Dashboard

Portfolio and league analytics.
Workspace ready
Use Sync to import a roster.

2026 FYPD Class

Players entering the MiLB system for the first time: the 2026 MLB Draft class and first-time international signees. Ranked by dynasty value: a measured expectation from draft slot or debut production, adjusted by the age curve. For established prospects, see the Prospect board.

Prospect Player Rankings

Top-100 + all 30 org Top-30 lists · ranked by projected Prospect Value · AAA Statcast tools →
Loading prospect rankings…
Loading study…

Methodology

Every signal, formula, and data source the model uses for player evaluation - organized by product.

Loading methodology…

Risers & Fallers - last 30 days