Schedule Strength, August 7

BOS has the best week for hitters; CLE the toughest.

Two things decide a week and neither is on a rankings page: how many games a team plays, and who they play. Between August 7 and August 13, 2026 the league splits 22 teams play 6 / 8 teams play 7, and opponents range from allowing 3.88 runs a game to 5.24, a spread worth more than most waiver moves.

Best weeks for your hitters

Most games against the pitching that gives up the most. This is the column to use for streaming bats and for deciding which of two similar players to start all week.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
BOS74.96TOR x4, ATH x3
TEX74.79LAA x4, BAL x3
LAD74.70AZ x3, KC x3, MIL
MIL74.53MIN x3, SD x3, LAD
PHI74.50TOR x3, STL x3, MIN
CIN65.24WSH x3, CWS x3
CHC65.13KC x3, WSH x3
LAA74.39TEX x4, MIA x3

Best weeks for your pitchers

The opposite question, and it needs the opposite column: most games against the offenses that score the least. A team can have a fine week for its bats and a poor one for its arms, which is why these are two tables and not one strength-of-schedule number.

TeamGamesOpp runs scored/gmOpponents
BOS74.08TOR x4, ATH x3
PHI74.19TOR x3, STL x3, MIN
LAA74.22TEX x4, MIA x3
TEX74.29LAA x4, BAL x3
LAD74.34AZ x3, KC x3, MIL
TOR74.42BOS x4, PHI x3
MIL74.53MIN x3, SD x3, LAD
MIN74.68MIL x3, BAL x3, PHI

Weeks to avoid

Fewest games, toughest opposition. If you have a marginal player here, this is the week to use the roster spot on someone else.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
CLE63.88CWS x3, DET x3
ATH63.93BOS x3, TB x3
SEA63.97TB x3, NYY x3
NYY63.98ATL x3, SEA x3
KC64.06CHC x3, LAD x3

What this means

Boston is the whole table. Seven games against pitching staffs allowing 4.96 runs per game is the only place next week where volume and opponent quality point the same direction, and the gap is wider than it looks. Seven times 4.96 gets you to roughly 34.7 runs of expected environment across the week. Cincinnati, whose 5.24 is the single softest per-game slate on the board, only gets six cracks at it: about 31.4. The team with the better opponent loses by three runs of scoring context because of one extra game. That is the point worth internalizing before you touch a lineup. Game count is not a tiebreaker here, it is the primary term.

The mechanism behind that is boring and it is why people misplay it. Opponent run environment moves in a band of maybe a run and a quarter from best to worst, from 5.24 down to 3.88. Game count moves by a sixth, seventeen percent, in one step. A sixth of your counting stats is worth more than a fifteen percent shift in the quality of the arms you face, and counting stats are what home runs, RBI, runs and steals actually are. So the Cubs bat at 5.13 all week and still finish behind Texas at 4.79, because Texas plays seven.

The case against leaning this hard on Boston: 4.96 is a season-long opponent rate, not a probable-pitcher list. A seven-game week that happens to line up two aces and a swingman is not the week the average implies, and nothing in this data tells you which arms are actually scheduled. If you have a Red Sox platoon bat who could sit twice, the seven games are five and the edge evaporates. That is the real risk, not the opponent. The falsifier is simple and it arrives fast: check the announced starters. If the week opens against two arms you would bench a hitter against on any other slate, the 4.96 was a mirage and you go back to the Reds or Cubs bat with the softer per-game draw.

On the pitching side the same team is the answer, which does not happen often. Boston's opponents score 4.08 per game, second-lowest on the board behind nobody who plays seven, and the Red Sox play seven. That is the combination you want: two starts from a mid-rotation arm against offenses producing four runs a game. Philadelphia is the close second, seven games at 4.19, and I would treat those two as interchangeable. Anaheim gives you seven at 4.22 and is the sneaky one, because nobody is excited about that staff and the schedule does not care.

Where this actually changes a call is Cleveland and Oakland. Six games each, and their hitters face staffs allowing 3.88 and 3.93, the two hardest slates listed. Run it out and a Cleveland bat is looking at roughly 23 runs of context for the week against Boston's 35. That is a fifty percent difference in scoring environment. Sit the marginal Guardians outfielder. The cost of being wrong is one hot six-game stretch you missed, which is survivable; the cost of being right is that you avoided the worst combination of slate and volume on the board.

Minnesota is the one I would not fight about either way. Seven games is real, but 4.28 is a bottom-third draw, and the week lands around 30 runs of context, right on top of six-game Chicago. Hold, do not chase.

How to read this

Game count leads and opponent quality breaks the tie, in that order. The difference between five games and seven is nearly a third of a week's production from the same player, which is a bigger effect than any realistic difference in who is pitching.

Hitters and pitchers get separate tables because they are asking opposite questions. Your bats want opponents who allow runs; your arms want opponents who do not score them, and one number cannot say both.

Opponent quality is full-season runs per game, not a recent hot streak. Ten games of a pitching staff is noise, and the question here is which schedule to prefer rather than which team is playing well this week.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings

Skip to main content

Redraft Rest of Season

Sorted by -
Loading history…
Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Loading…
Loading rankings…
Overview

Operations Dashboard

Portfolio and league analytics.
Workspace ready
Use Sync to import a roster.

2026 FYPD Class

Players entering the MiLB system for the first time: the 2026 MLB Draft class and first-time international signees. Ranked by dynasty value: a measured expectation from draft slot or debut production, adjusted by the age curve. For established prospects, see the Prospect board.

Prospect Player Rankings

Top-100 + all 30 org Top-30 lists · ranked by projected Prospect Value · AAA Statcast tools →
Loading prospect rankings…
Loading study…

Methodology

Every signal, formula, and data source the model uses for player evaluation - organized by product.

Loading methodology…

Risers & Fallers - last 30 days