Schedule Strength, August 6

BOS has the best week for hitters; NYY the toughest.

Two things decide a week and neither is on a rankings page: how many games a team plays, and who they play. Between August 6 and August 12, 2026 the league splits 1 teams play 5 / 16 teams play 6 / 13 teams play 7, and opponents range from allowing 3.96 runs a game to 5.36, a spread worth more than most waiver moves.

Best weeks for your hitters

Most games against the pitching that gives up the most. This is the column to use for streaming bats and for deciding which of two similar players to start all week.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
BOS75.07ATH x3, TOR x3, CWS
BAL74.75TEX x3, MIN x3, LAA
AZ74.73LAD x3, COL x3, SD
MIL74.68MIN x3, SD x3, PIT
CIN65.36WSH x3, CWS x2, ATH
PHI74.56TOR x3, STL x3, WSH
LAA74.43MIA x3, TEX x3, BAL
MIN74.40MIL x3, BAL x3, KC

Best weeks for your pitchers

The opposite question, and it needs the opposite column: most games against the offenses that score the least. A team can have a fine week for its bats and a poor one for its arms, which is why these are two tables and not one strength-of-schedule number.

TeamGamesOpp runs scored/gmOpponents
BOS74.12ATH x3, TOR x3, CWS
LAA74.29MIA x3, TEX x3, BAL
PHI74.29TOR x3, STL x3, WSH
ATL74.32NYY x3, NYM x3, MIA
BAL74.37TEX x3, MIN x3, LAA
ATH74.38BOS x3, TB x3, CIN
TOR74.48PHI x3, BOS x3, CHC
MIL74.55MIN x3, SD x3, PIT

Weeks to avoid

Fewest games, toughest opposition. If you have a marginal player here, this is the week to use the roster spot on someone else.

TeamGamesOpp runs allowed/gmOpponents
NYY53.96ATL x3, SEA x2
SEA64.01TB x3, NYY x2, DET
CLE64.12CWS x3, DET x2, NYM
CWS64.25CLE x3, CIN x2, BOS
PIT64.32NYM x3, MIA x2, MIL

What this means

Boston is the one team on this list where the schedule argues for both halves of your roster at once. Seven games, opponents who allow 5.07 runs a game, opponents who score 4.12. That combination does not usually exist. Normally a soft-pitching slate means you are facing bad pitching staffs attached to good offenses, and the two effects cancel. Here they compound. If you have a Red Sox bat on your bench for matchup reasons, next week is the week you stop benching it, and if you have a back-end Boston arm you were going to skip, start him.

The genuinely arguable case is Cincinnati against Boston, and it is arguable because the two inputs point opposite ways. Cincinnati's opponents allow 5.36 runs a game, the softest pitching any team on this board sees. But it is six games, not seven. Multiply it out and Boston's week is worth roughly 35 opponent runs allowed against Cincinnati's 32, so the extra game more than eats the quality edge. The counterargument is real: opponent runs allowed is a season-long team rate, and it says nothing about which four or five starters you actually draw. A six-game week that happens to miss two aces is better than a seven-game week that catches them. If you can see the probable matchups and Cincinnati's slate is stacked with fifth starters and bullpen games, flip the order. Absent that information, take the game.

The Yankees are the sit, and it is not close. Five games is the smallest count here, and the opponents allow 3.96 runs a game, the stingiest number on the board. You are getting two fewer games than a Boston hitter against pitching that is meaningfully better. That is the worst hitting week available, and there is no compensating pitching angle either, since Yankees arms face offenses scoring 4.53, on the wrong side of average for this group. So the fringe Yankee bat, the platoon guy, the second catcher, comes out of the lineup. The cost of being wrong is small: five games of a marginal player is not where seasons are won, and the number would have to be badly misleading for a five-game week to beat a seven-game week anywhere.

For pitching, the interesting name is the White Sox. Six games against offenses scoring 4.08 runs a game, the lowest mark here, and their hitters draw pitching allowing 4.25, which is poor. That is a clean split: start the Chicago arm, bench the Chicago bat. Los Angeles offers something similar on the pitching side, six games against offenses scoring 4.17, with the bonus that their hitters face staffs allowing 5.07. Seattle and Cleveland look pitcher-friendly on the surface because their opponents' scoring rates sit at 4.52 and 4.38, but those are ordinary numbers, and six games of ordinary is not a reason to move anyone.

What would show this read is wrong is straightforward. Rainouts and doubleheaders are the whole ballgame, because game count is doing more work in these calls than opponent quality is. If Boston loses one to weather, the Cincinnati comparison inverts immediately. And if the teams you are targeting line up their best starters against the soft-pitching opponents, the opponent rate you are leaning on stops describing your week.

Two actions, then. Start everything Boston for seven games. Sit the marginal Yankee and do not talk yourself back into him on five.

How to read this

Game count leads and opponent quality breaks the tie, in that order. The difference between five games and seven is nearly a third of a week's production from the same player, which is a bigger effect than any realistic difference in who is pitching.

Hitters and pitchers get separate tables because they are asking opposite questions. Your bats want opponents who allow runs; your arms want opponents who do not score them, and one number cannot say both.

Opponent quality is full-season runs per game, not a recent hot streak. Ten games of a pitching staff is noise, and the question here is which schedule to prefer rather than which team is playing well this week.

All articles · Redraft rankings · Dynasty rankings

Skip to main content

Redraft Rest of Season

Sorted by -
Loading history…
Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Official MiLB Prospect Rankings

Loading…
Loading rankings…
Overview

Operations Dashboard

Portfolio and league analytics.
Workspace ready
Use Sync to import a roster.

2026 FYPD Class

Players entering the MiLB system for the first time: the 2026 MLB Draft class and first-time international signees. Ranked by dynasty value: a measured expectation from draft slot or debut production, adjusted by the age curve. For established prospects, see the Prospect board.

Prospect Player Rankings

Top-100 + all 30 org Top-30 lists · ranked by projected Prospect Value · AAA Statcast tools →
Loading prospect rankings…
Loading study…

Methodology

Every signal, formula, and data source the model uses for player evaluation - organized by product.

Loading methodology…

Risers & Fallers - last 30 days